WithSharedComponentFilter version entity

I was wondering if someone could help me out. In the snippet of code below im running a job with .WithSharedComponentFilter(id). Is there a way to do this without version the entity. This job should only run once

Thanks in advance

Code (CSharp):

1.  
2.  
3. JobHandle sequentialDeps = inputDeps; // Chain job dependencies
4. foreach (PlanetTagId id  in planetId)
5. {
6.    
7.     JobHandle thisJobHandle = Entities
8.         .WithSharedComponentFilter(id)
9.         .ForEach((int entityInQueryIndex, in PlanetTileBiomeComponent b) =>
10.         {
11.             Debug.Log(
12.                 "<b> <size=13> <color=#EA3432>Info : PlanetCreateBiomsSystem : SetDepsSetBioms 1.</color> </size> </b>");
13.         })
14.         .WithChangeFilter<PlanetTagId>()
15.         .WithName("SetDepsSetBioms")
16.         .WithoutBurst()
17.         .Schedule(sequentialDeps);
18.         sequentialDeps = thisJobHandle;
19. }
20.  
21. return sequentialDeps;
22.  
23.  

 

Bump

 

In the code below from my understanding if noting changes on TestComponent then the job should not schedual but when ever I used .WithSharedComponentFilter() it trumps my WithChangeFilter()
Is the a way to WithChangeFilter and WithSharedComponentFilter

Code (CSharp):

1.  
2.  
3. [LIST=1]
4. [*]JobHandle sequentialDeps = inputDeps; // Chain job dependencies
5. [*]foreach (PlanetTagId id  in planetId)
6. [*]{
7. [*]  
8. [*]    JobHandle thisJobHandle = Entities
9. [*]        .WithSharedComponentFilter(id)
10. [*]        .ForEach((int entityInQueryIndex, in PlanetTileBiomeComponent b) =>
11. [*]        {
12. [*]            Debug.Log(
13. [*]                "<b> <size=13> <color=#EA3432>Info : PlanetCreateBiomsSystem : SetDepsSetBioms 1.</color> </size> </b>");
14. [*]        })
15. [*]        .WithChangeFilter<TestComponent>()
16. [*]        .WithName("SetDepsSetBioms")
17. [*]        .WithoutBurst()
18. [*]        .Schedule(sequentialDeps);
19. [*]        sequentialDeps = thisJobHandle;
20. [*]}
21. [*]
22.  
23. [*]return sequentialDeps;
24. [/LIST]
25.  
26.  

 

maybe someone can let me know the expected behavior, not not even sure on that