Search Unity

  1. Welcome to the Unity Forums! Please take the time to read our Code of Conduct to familiarize yourself with the forum rules and how to post constructively.

Unity Wiki is back up!

Discussion in 'Announcements' started by Aurore, Aug 8, 2012.

  1. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
  2. zipper

    zipper

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Posts:
    89
    Woot!!! ( yeah i know this adds nothing to the thread, but, but... woooooot!!!!!)

    zipper
     
  3. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Good job :)

    I really wish i could catch those morons, and give them some lessons ...
     
  4. Eric5h5

    Eric5h5

    Volunteer Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Posts:
    32,352
    Whoa...different domain name. :) (Or maybe that should be :(, since all those links I've posted in the past will not work anymore...alas.)

    --Eric
     
  5. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    Probably not which is a pain. The link on the community home page isn't going to right place either but I've alerted people about that.
     
  6. jashan

    jashan

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Posts:
    3,304
    Great to hear it's back online and I like it that this is now totally official ;-) are you planning to integrate the Wiki into UDN? That would be awesome ;-)

    Regarding the links (which I feel is a major issue):

    What about setting the original Wiki to read only and adding a permanent redirect to the correct page of the new wiki on each page of the old Wiki. That shouldn't be too hard: simply take the current URL and replace "www.unifycommunity.com/wiki/" with "wiki.unity3d.com/". Not sure about PHP or that specific Wiki software but in ASP.NET that should be just one line of code in the right template.

    Another thing you might consider is doing that same replacement in the content tables of forums, answers and maybe even feedback. That way, all links from UT Web apps would directly work, and this also shouldn't be too hard to do (sitting at lunch, so I don't have the SQL syntax at hand ATM ;-) ). Oh wait: This should do:

    http://www.sqlteam.com/article/using-replace-in-an-update-statement

    The permanent redirects are still important because I believe there's also quite a few blog postings out there linking into the Wiki.
     
  7. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Is it just me or is the formatting of the scripts now mixed up?
     
  8. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    Mixed up how? I'm not mega familiar so bare with :)
     
  9. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    The plan is to redirect all unifycommunity.com/wiki traffic to the new URL, so eventually all the wiki links posted will work. We just don't know exactly when, but not too long. The web guys are on it though!
     
  10. Eric5h5

    Eric5h5

    Volunteer Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Posts:
    32,352
    Oops, yeah...the one page I quickly checked earlier (this one) seemed to be OK (except for syntax highlighting), but most of the others seem to have non-formatted code.

    --Eric
     
  11. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    Yup that's an issue and the web team are on it.
     
  12. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Good to know. Thanks :)

    I thought more about this stuff here, which i saw more than once. The C# version is out of any formatting. And the Javascript version has formatting, but shows some odd boxes around the codeparts.

    http://wiki.unity3d.com/index.php/Wander
     
  13. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    Thanks, I'm sure the web team will look out for all the code formatting, at least I hope so XD I'll keep an eye on the problem and update.
     
  14. Deleted User

    Deleted User

    Guest

    Maybe we should have additional script sections for iOS and Android (or just mobile)? I'm thinking of posting an iAd script (once the formatting issues are resolved) but I'm not sure where it should go.
     
  15. Deleted User

    Deleted User

    Guest

    By the way, the Creative Commons license is a nice addition!
     
  16. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    I think the formatting issue is resolved now, if anyone finds any problems though let me know!
     
  17. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    It`s a limitation. What was totally free before requires to have a very close look at the license now that the code snippet is under. And even the most free CC license requires some action. I don`t really like that.

    Just curious, since the code snippets were created by other community members and not Unity, have you asked them if you are allowed to put their work under the CC license?
     
  18. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    Surely if you post a code snippet or a piece of knowledge on a wiki, you assume that people will use or adapt it. The CC protects the contributors in that no one can make money off their work.
     
  19. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Sure. It delivers some protection for the authors. But that`s the problem already. Some stuff at the wiki is really basic. Will you sue now everybody with the CC license from the wiki when he has found an equal solution?

    We have reached the problematic area of software patents here. Before the CC licenses at the Wiki i didn`t have to worry to use let`s say some crossfade between two cameras. A few lines of code. And not this much space to make it different from the solution that can be found in the wiki. Now i have to check for every line of code in the Wiki if my solution that i have found for my problem isn`t already listed somewhere. Means if i need to give somebody credits for it. Most of the times something that is this common that it should be completely free at all. And not limited by any license.

    I don`t exactly know how it`s handled elsewhere. But in germany something needs to have what we call creation depth, before the content can be seen as something that is under a copyrigt. And most of the Wiki scripts simply miss this goal. You can`t copyright the alphabet.

    I would really love when the Wiki would be CC license free as before. I´m really unhappy with it. I see this step to put the content of the Wiki under CC as highly problematic.
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2012
  20. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    You won't need to check every single line of code you've ever written. As you mentioned basic functions will be the same or similar, I think if you end up heavily using the wiki then you will need to add the wiki in the credits just like you would any 3D package or even Unity itself when making a commercial game.

    I'll look into the possibilities of posting a clearer explanation on the wiki.
     
  21. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Hm, the CC clearly says that you need to name every author where you use the work from, one by one. It`s not enough to name just the Wiki. And yes, i have to check. When there`s a license then i need to follow it. Else i do something illegal. And it doesn`t help me when i didn`t know about an existing Wiki script.

    That`s the main problem with such licenses. You trap yourself too easily.
     
  22. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    I'm looking into it
     
  23. Eric5h5

    Eric5h5

    Volunteer Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Posts:
    32,352
    As someone who contributed quite a few scripts, I don't think it should use a Creative Commons license. When you use a wiki like that, you should expect it's essentially public domain.

    --Eric
     
  24. lilymontoute

    lilymontoute

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Posts:
    1,181
    IANAL, but:

    I would suggest CC0 for code/file content unless otherwise stated (that part is important!). That better reflects how the wiki has been used historically in the past. If an author wants to require attribution or something else, they can put their own license for their content (The wiki terms may need to be changed so that people posting can only optionally apply their own license to code snippets and uploaded files, not general wiki text). Also, it's totally possible to have wiki text itself under an attribution license, separate from any code blocks.
     
  25. Deleted User

    Deleted User

    Guest

    I don't know if the CC license is the best choice, but it's better to have a license explicitly listed than just leave it open to interpretation. The CC share-alike license is the one used by wikipedia, and doesn't say you can't use it commercially. Perhaps using the CC license for text and public domain for code is the way to go. For software I generally like to see something like the MIT license but I don't know how well that works with wikis where anyone can edit a contribution. Offhand, I don't know of a wiki that actually has a good license for code, e.g. the LSL wiki just says you contribute code with the understanding that other people can modify and use it for non-profit purposes.
     
  26. Deleted User

    Deleted User

    Guest

    Also, let's be clear - the CC share-alike license doesn't say you need to list every single author. It says you must attribute the work as specified by the author or licensor (in this case, it would be Unity).

    You are free:
    to Share—to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and
    to Remix—to adapt the work
    Under the following conditions:
    Attribution—You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work.)
    Share Alike—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license.
    With the understanding that:
    Waiver—Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
    Other Rights—In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license:
    your fair dealing or fair use rights;
    the author's moral rights; and
    rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, such as publicity or privacy rights.
    Notice—For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do that is with a link to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
     
  27. AngryAnt

    AngryAnt

    Keyboard Operator Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Posts:
    3,045
    We have not changed the license on the wiki in the move.

    I thought this was set to public domain (and fully agree that it should be), but apparently it is not.

    I'll talk to Neil about it.
     
  28. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Any news on the license issue?
     
  29. NCarter

    NCarter

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Posts:
    686
    The wiki's licensing has always been very vague. This is the closest thing we have to a statement on licensing, Creative Commons badge aside. I think that it'd be best to make the whole thing public domain and make it clear on the front page that this effectively converts all existing content to also be public domain.

    That's all fine except where the contributors of existing content decide that their stuff shouldn't be public domain. For example, if they want attribution. You occasionally see contributors putting copyright messages (!) on their wiki contributions, too.

    In my opinion, those users should review their contributions and decide whether they want to make them public domain or remove them entirely.
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2012
  30. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Yes, Public domain is the most recommended licensing here.
     
  31. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    The creative commons explanation on that site is super vague
     
  32. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    The creative commons license itself not though.
     
  33. Aurore

    Aurore

    Director of Real-Time Learning Unity Technologies

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2012
    Posts:
    3,106
    I know but for anyone not willing to go digging before they contribute, it can be troublesome.
     
  34. Tiles

    Tiles

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Posts:
    2,480
    Indeed. That`s why the Wiki stuff should be under Public Domain.
     
  35. WalterEspinar

    WalterEspinar

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Posts:
    82
    Ohh very good news!
     
  36. Play_Edu

    Play_Edu

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2012
    Posts:
    722
    hi,
    Good news for us
     
  37. ootuskaai

    ootuskaai

    Joined:
    May 29, 2013
    Posts:
    1
    awesome:p ty share :D