Search Unity

  1. Unity 6 Preview is now available. To find out what's new, have a look at our Unity 6 Preview blog post.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Unity is excited to announce that we will be collaborating with TheXPlace for a summer game jam from June 13 - June 19. Learn more.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Dismiss Notice

Feedback Regarding Gameplay in RoadMap

Discussion in 'Open Projects' started by DSivtsov, Oct 30, 2020.

  1. DSivtsov

    DSivtsov

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2019
    Posts:
    152
    Because the RoadMap is the road to search informations IMHO, It's demanding to more correctly groups card regarding Gameplay:
    1. All cards regarding Gameplay must exist in main card Gameplay. (minor changes)
    At current some card Winning condition, Game over, Fighting fully separated (they are in one bunch with other controls, platforms).

    2. It's demanding to separate GamePlay on different cards(major changes):
    By Example exist the very popular thread (and an important topic) cooking/crafting system -- or gameplay design but cards is absent and it haven't Official predix (by standart), and it is difficult to find among other important topics.
    Note. May be it's a good idea to separated the main thread on sub threads (only second month of project from six, but we have four screens of threads, it's a hard find something without direct link from RoadMap especial for new ones) ? (Question1)

    3. Gameplays card have very low priority, but in reality have very powerful fluent on all other topics?
    For beginning I propose in this theme discuss it:
    Question2. Which other topics regarding GamePlay demanding to discuss and separate to special threads (exclude exist: Winning condition, Game over, Fighting, Cooking/Crafting):
    - Regular gameplay ? (threads is absent)
    - Dialogues and cutscenes? (thread exist but didn't link ro RoadMap).
    May be others?
     
  2. cirocontinisio

    cirocontinisio

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    884
    In the Game Design wiki deck, you shouldn't interpret priorities for what it says :D we just used them to group cards into three groups.

    The alternative is to group them Manually, and then we'd get something like this:

    upload_2020-10-31_21-38-43.png

    Better? Worse? I'm not sure, I like the groups :)

    I'll take your other suggestions into consideration, thanks!
     
  3. DSivtsov

    DSivtsov

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2019
    Posts:
    152
    This variant is worse. (visually all in one group :()
    Will be more useful to create separate deck "Gameplay" and put to this all cards related with Gameplay organization and which demanding to discuss or make more detail describing
    Sorry for misunderstanding :oops:
     
    cirocontinisio likes this.
  4. cirocontinisio

    cirocontinisio

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    884
    I'll leave them ordered in groups by Priority then.

    For the rest, don't consider them tasks. So they don't necessarily have a thread associated.