Third Party Photon Pun 2 RPC Issue

I've been struggling with this problem in my multiplayer game for a few days now. I'm using this line to instantiate my player object:

GameObject newPlayer = PhotonNetwork.Instantiate(playerPrefab.name, Vector3.zero, Quaternion.identity);

The master client instantiates an object over the network called NetworkManager that finds the master client in the start function using this:

Code (CSharp):

1. foreach (PlayerController playerController in FindObjectsOfType<PlayerController>()) {
2.  
3.        if (playerController.photonView.OwnerActorNr == PhotonNetwork.MasterClient.ActorNumber) {
4.  
5.                 masterController = playerController;
6.  
7.        }
8. }

When the game is ready to start I call an RPC in my PlayerController script which is on the object to start the game for each player:

Code (CSharp):

1. [PunRPC]
2.     public void StartGameRPC() {
3.  
4.         if (photonView.IsMine) {
5.  
6.             //logic goes here
7.  
8.         }
9.     }

The RPC successfully runs for every client connected to the room but for some reason the photonView in my RPC is always the master client's photonView no matter which client its being run for. I've been trying different things but I can't seem to figure out why.

 

You haven't shown how you are calling the RPC

 

I call it in the Update method in the Network Manager script:

Code (CSharp):

1. private void Update() {
2.  
3.         if (masterController.photonView.IsMine && PhotonNetwork.PlayerList.Length == gameManager.GetMaxPlayers() && gameManager.GetGameState() == GameManager.GameState.Waiting) {
4.  
5.             masterController.photonView.RPC("StartGameRPC", RpcTarget.All);
6.  
7.         }
8.     }

 

I do not have checked the main problem but man ... never send RPC in update method...
If you have a high latency, you gonna send it every game loop until you get the correct GameState...

 

Yea I realized that after I posted this and used a boolean check to make sure the RPC is only called once, is there still a problem with this method?