multiple classes with similar components?

I don't want someone helps me if he does not know how speaks
If you read ,you can see. It does not need I say
I always thank and like but he is so rude and says why I participate your conversation
he doesn't know formal and polite conversation. he uses hell ,insult me ,...
so it is better he does not help

 

Okay, I really dont think you either read my post or the others but thats fine, take this approach to getting help on a forum.

Im out, and I hope you apologise to the people who spent a week here trying to help you before they are out too.

 

What do you mean? Are you ok? If you want you can apologize but I behave with someone like himself
I only said if some one insults me ,don't need to help ok?
and he does not spend one week for me!, if you mean lordofduct
I helped alot too but it does not mean insulting and mocking
finish spam

 

Edit: Unlocked but if there's any issues like people taking things personally, I'll use the thread ban feature. Please treat each other with the minimum required politeness

Assume people are talking personal issues if you visit www.facebook.com not forum.unity.com. This site is for the development of games and digital content.

 

I agree that our environment does and should have an effect on our behavior. However, just because something is available to me doesn't mean that I will choose to use it.

Unfortunately, software is one of the unusual places in the universe where backward compatibility has to trump forward thinking. Unity has been around for quite a while, so it has a long history of design decisions. Unity also targets its scripting engine to programmers and non-programmers alike. This means they have included some questionable features simply to reduce the barrier to entry. I don't think I need to convince you that GameObject.Find(string) or StartCoroutine(string methodName, object value = null) may not be the best tools in a medium to large project.

As our understanding of programming evolves, so should our decisions and habits.

Before I groked object oriented programming, I used to think stateless classes were the epitome of good style because they would be thread safe by default. Little did I know, I was committing the biggest offense to oo possible, I was just writing procedural code. Now that I know, I am careful to use oo techniques even when I'm tempted to do something otherwise.

As we learn more about the pitfalls of the service locator, I don't see a reason to continue using it. I get that it takes time and energy to learn new methods and not everyone will be interested in doing that.
​

 

The unlock is my fault, so I feel compelled to talk meta, even though I usually avoid it..

lordofduct isn't exactly known for his tact, but he is an extremely bright, helpful, and active user on the forum. If he's giving you a tip on your question style, I'd do my best to take it despite how bitter it might taste.

I think we'd gotten past the name calling on this one and the conversation was somewhat productive, so unless you have a personal stake in the commentary, let's leave hippocoder out of things.