Is each PlayableBehaviour bound to a single ScriptPlayable (and vice versa)?

I'm wondering if we can use our implementation of PlayableBehaviour to store per-playable/per-clip data.

When we create a script playable, we do something like:

Code (CSharp):

1.         public override Playable CreatePlayable(PlayableGraph graph, GameObject owner)
2.         {
3.             var playable = ScriptPlayable<MyBehaviour>.Create(graph);
4.             var behaviour = playable.GetBehaviour();
5.             return playable;
6.         }

If we were to pass the Playable reference back to the Behaviour, would that be guaranteed to be a 1-to-1 mapping? In other words, can we rely on the fact that each behaviour instance is mapped to a single playable, and vice versa, is each playable governed by a single behaviour?

Concretely, am I shooting myself in the foot by doing this:

Code (CSharp):

1.         public override Playable CreatePlayable(PlayableGraph graph, GameObject owner)
2.         {
3.             var playable = ScriptPlayable<MyBehaviour>.Create(graph);
4.             var behaviour = playable.GetBehaviour();
5.             behaviour.playable = playable;
6.             return playable;
7.         }

Or in other words, will this return true, for example:

Code (CSharp):

1.         public class MyBehaviour : PlayableBehaviour
2. {
3.     public Playable playable;
4.  
5.     void OnProcessFrame(Playable playable, /* etc. */)
6.     {
7.         Debug.Log(playable == this.playable);
8.     }
9. }

 

Thanks for the quick confirmation!