Search Unity

  1. Looking for a job or to hire someone for a project? Check out the re-opened job forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Unity 2020 LTS & Unity 2021.1 have been released.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Good news ✨ We have more Unite Now videos available for you to watch on-demand! Come check them out and ask our experts any questions!
    Dismiss Notice

Unity Feedback on Open Projects?

Discussion in 'Open Projects' started by cirocontinisio, Jan 23, 2021.

  1. cirocontinisio


    Unity Technologies

    Jun 20, 2016
    Hey all. We're (maybe) halfway through on the journey of this first Open Project. However, in the interest of making things better while we're still at it, me and the team wanted to capture your feedback on the initiative while it's hot. When we say initiative, we mean all of it:
    • The game development process of Chop Chop
    • Handling of the forums, communication
    • The bi-weekly livestreams ("Open Projects: The Journey")
    • The monthly Devlogs and related demo branches
    We're particularly interested in your feedback on the video content we make, both the live and pre-recorded videos. Do you watch them? Are they useful? Boring? Too dense or too high-level?
    Do you watch The Journey live, or only the recording?

    Please let us know your feedback below. If you have some criticism, it would be great to hear also how you think it should be handled instead. Also, very importantly, please keep in mind the framing of this initiative and of the game we're making.

    Thanks in advance!
  2. Harsh-099


    May 1, 2020
    Yes, they are really informative. We learn a lot of things from videos and the project itself. This project itself is a great initiative for both the community and Unity. I have learned from this project and implemented the nearly same pattern of event system and scene loading system in my own project (sorry about that).

    But I am having a problem with the editor Initialisation loader, which some times returns from the start method without setting the is Editor initialisation mode to true and therefore not raising the inSceneLoaded event and therefore not spawning the player(which is being discussed here:

    One personal request, please take a look at this thread: (it had been a month)
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2021
    Amel-Unity and cirocontinisio like this.
  3. Appleguysnake


    Jan 9, 2015
    I was really excited about this idea, but I was late to the party and thought maybe I missed my chance (having heard the 6 month timeline). Now I'm trying to get up to speed and finding it easier than I expected. Even if I don't end up participating, I've already learned a lot just from checking the updates. And the livestreams have been really enjoyable to watch, Ciro, Chema, and Amel have a great rapport, making the whole project feel fun and welcoming.

    I didn't expect as much video content as there already is, but if you were considering adding to it I would suggest maybe a monthly high-level update. Less detailed than the livestreams, less focused on one feature than the devlogs. Essentially a way to catch up without reading dozens of forum threads, especially to make it easier for people to stay on top of things across disciplines, or from the outside. Along the lines of "Username suggested x, but it didn't work, so we're doing y to solve the problem instead. Meanwhile in the story, we changed out this character, so we're changing this feature". That might overlap a bit with the opening of the livestreams, but please don't stop trying to commentate videos in realtime, it's great! :)
  4. calculus7


    Sep 23, 2014
    I think that the livestreams are fantastic. I only caught episode 7 live, but I've watched all of them (a few times, actually). They were great since I got a bit of a late start in contributing to this project. It helped bring me up to speed on what systems were implemented and gave a good overview of the overall architecture...perfect jumping off point for making contributions. You guys have really nailed the livestreams. Fantastic job.

    As I mentioned elsewhere on the forums, I think the Open Projects initiative is a stroke of genius. It's great for all skill levels. For me, it provides a structure that forces constant forward movement. I know that when I work on my own projects, I'm always taking one step forward and two steps back because I focus on perfecting systems before moving on...and that's when the dreaded scope creep comes in. But because there's a team behind this project, forward progress is always made. And I appreciate being able to contribute to a project that might ACTUALLY be completed some day.

    One thing that I do think might help a bit is if the maintainers of the GitHub repositories posted on this forum how they are planning to evolve the major branches over time. I'm not talking detailed posts for every little thing, but it might be helpful if there was a thread were you guys could post a one-sentence explanation of a change you are going to make...something like: "I'm working on a change that's going to move the DialogueLineSO component in ActorSO to another script." And that change might not happen for a few weeks or so, but at least we know it's coming. It's just a way to give a general idea of how parts of the main codebase are shifting around so that those submitting PRs can anticipate this. I just think there should be some place where we learn about implemented or planned changes to the main codebase which updates us more than every two weeks, which is what we get with the livestreams. Sure, we can keep up-to-date with the main repository, but that doesn't account for soon-to-come codebase changes.

    The reason I say that is because if I'm working on a system that interacts with many other systems (as I have detailed in this post:, I'd like to stay on top of what changes I need to make to my codebase so that its compatible. I don't want the PR-merging team to have to take care of this because it's my submission. I'd like to submit something complete and working, and make sure it's not a headache for those testing it out. Furthermore, if I know how a codebase is going to change in advance, I might decide on a completely different architecture for my contributions.

    Also, since it takes a lot of effort to keep our PRs up-to-date with the latest version of the ever-evolving codebase, I think it would be great if we would have a little early feedback on whether the team generally likes the contribution or doesn't see it fitting in with the project. I get that everyone is busy, but just a simple like on a forum post could be an indicator that the team generally likes the direction the contribution is going, but hasn't had time to review the PR yet. Or maybe a comment: "Before you develop this system further, please wait for us to give you feedback on the PR"...which is basically a nice way of saying I'm not sure this is going to fit. It doesn't have to be definitive either way, but just a hint of right track / wrong track would be helpful. But then again, this is my first contribution and it was only within the last couple days...I'm not sure how long it normally takes the team to review a PR. I just don't want to put in a lot of time maintaining something if it's going nowhere. Limbo is a hard place to be in and with very sporadic free time, I want to make sure that I'm spending it doing useful work.

    But I get all of that is adding more on top of a team that probably has more than enough to deal with right now. And if that's the case, then that's okay. Just wanted to give my two guys asked for it, after all! =D

    At any rate, thank you. You guys have changed the game with this new initiative. I'm looking forward to continuing to evolve this project and see what else is in the pipeline for Open Projects!
  5. treivize


    Jan 27, 2016
    Here is my feedback about the different topics:

    The game development process of Chop Chop
    - I know it is difficult to manage all the community contributions, but given the time it takes to review PRs, it is really difficult to do incremental delivery. Maybe it is fine but it will be good to have just a bit more feedback from the core team when you start looking at a PR, just to stop working at it (refactoring it / continue to add more functionalities on top of it)
    - Given the core team is key in the integration of community contribution, maybe share a bit more transparently what the core team is busy on (working on a particular part of the game, livestream preparation, other unity task (GGJ?)) just to understand your capacity to interact with the community over the week.

    Handling of the forums, communication
    - Forum is really active and you already do your maximum to reply to most of the posts and the community is helping a lot here too.
    - About Codecks, I have the feeling that is a bit too static between 2 livestreams and tasks are not enough split according to me. I know it will require extra time for you to maintain them, but I think it would help on focusing the community on what can be really do and see things progressing.

    The bi-weekly livestreams ("Open Projects: The Journey")
    - They are just really cool!
    - It is cool also to see more and more big sections related to community based contributions

    The monthly Devlogs and related demo branches
    - They are really good and the short format balanced very well the long livestream content.
    - They provide a valuable and precise insight on key features of the project. I guess it helps people to join the project after it started.
    - Also When this project will be over they will remain a mine of information on particular aspects of the game development.
    Amel-Unity and cirocontinisio like this.
  6. aby_gamemaker


    Nov 5, 2020
    Lives and devlogs are going great but sometimes the topics are a little too technical to grasp if it is the very first time hearing about it.

    For the forums, some restructuring is needed.
    If you could divide the open projects forum further into project 1, 2, 3 and so on.

    And then every project could itself be divided into a brainstorming thread, an official discussion thread and two development threads, one each for code and art.

    You can appoint most experienced members of the community to moderate the forums, this way some of your load can be taken off.
    Amel-Unity likes this.
  7. Smurjo


    Dec 25, 2019
    Don't get me wrong, I really enjoy this project and the live streams too - but to be told please follow the discussion on twitter on top of the live streams, the codecks, the wiki, the ever increasing number of forums threads and discord is putting me off somewhat...
    Can't we at least keep the discussion somewhat together?
    Amel-Unity and cirocontinisio like this.
  8. kudamuchi


    Jul 11, 2013
    Hi, l am loving this project awesome job to everyone l have been following the project from the being and watching the Live steamers and devlogs. l have a suggestion could you please small devlogs that show in full detail how to set up the characters to make them move when l download the project on git nothing will be setup so have to rewatch the live steamers just look on how you have set the chief character to move which scripts l need to attach to the chief prefab of which you don't go upstep by upstep in detail on how you got the character to move or which scripts l have to attach to enemies to make them attack which is why we need the less technical smaller devlogs.
    Amel-Unity and cirocontinisio like this.
  9. cirocontinisio


    Unity Technologies

    Jun 20, 2016
    We've read the feedback (and hopefully acted on it a little as well) but I never said "thanks", it's very good. Also thanks for the numerous compliments, Amel, Chema and I really appreciate them!

    As I understand it, main point of criticism is that you want to understand better what's going on to be able to contribute better, either with faster feedback on your PRs and contributions, or with us explicitly saying what we're working on that you might not see in the immediate. It's a good point. Tomorrow I have a sync with the team so we might start posting these plans in the Updates thread.

    If you have more feedback or it evolved over time, feel free to drop it here :)

    We can't create a devlog on every little detail (also because they change all the time!) but for your specific question, we have some instructions in the wiki. Does that help?
    calculus7 likes this.
  10. TatoD


    Oct 11, 2020

    The project has been a lot of fun to work on.

    The live streams are a really great tool for so many reasons. As a contributor, it really helps me to see the status of the contributions at a given time so I can allocate my efforts accordingly. It is also especially helpful in such a visual and user-based project such as this because we all can easily see the visuals and hear the audio and get the core team's take on these types of things.

    It is also cool to see a lot of little UI/UX considerations flagged by contributors. It makes it feel like we are almost user testing and contributing at the same time, which is a huge advantage this project has. On that note, I think having this game as an open source project has been a major success from my view.

    cirocontinisio likes this.