Alloy Physical Shader Framework Version 3 For Unity 5

Yeah, for the hair shader, sorry.

The default cutout is just a regular cutout. I mean the cutout having Dithering.

I did it 2 times a few months ago, but new materials that I used hair was again regular cutout. I don't know how I did the hair shader become Dithering.


This image was when I was testing a few months ago.

Dithering was working on both High and low quality.

Now I can't activate it anymore.

 

@RenOli
Impressive. Question, were you in Forward or Deferred mode? If it was Forward, did you have AA enabled with Alpha to Coverage?

 

Hello, I have a question regarding the skin shader. I am using unity in deferred and i'm wondering about cast shadows. Basically, I want Subsurface Scattering to be occluded if the object isn't directly lit. So for example if The light is being casted on the left side of the head, the right ear shouldn't be showing any sub surface scattering. Uber Shader has cast shadows on their skin shader, but it didn't work for my project so I am purchased Alloy a while back but haven't found any information on the subject. For example here, light shouldn't be going through the back of the head because the back of the head should be occluding/casting a shadow on the front side, if that makes sense.



Can anyone help me here?

 

@Abuthar
The problem applying a shadow map to transmission effects is that it will just completely crush the effect since it is rendered from the mesh's opposing faces. As a result, we can only enable shadowing on translucency for thin, two-sided meshes using the "TwoSided" variant of the transmission shader.

Sorry, but that's a technical limitation that I just can't work around.

 

@n00body

any chance to implement Nvidia VR works with alloy

 

@OP3NGL
If Unity exposes a shader API for it, then I will take advantage of it. Until then, I can't really do it on my own.

 

Unity 2017.2.0b6/Alloy 4.1
Using Alloy Triplanar material with object type mapping selected.
However, it reverts to World mapping while in Play mode and back to Object mapping after exiting Play mode.

 

@Don-Gray
Yeah, that's been an off and on issue for a while now. Unfortunately, it looks like I will need to take drastic measures with those shaders, which will require everyone who uses them to run our migrator tool once the fix is available. >_<

 

Sorry

 

@Don-Gray
Don't be. Just a growing pain of managing a framework this complex. It will get done, but it will be a pain.

 

Thought it would be possible since Uber does cast shadows on translucency, but I need this to work right in deferred. Thanks for the reply though.

 

Anyone know if there is a global regenerate option for all of the AlloyPM files? On our last update it somehow broke 'em so they are all blank or pink and need to be regenerated. I restarted after updating as well but it must think they are fine since there is a file there and they don't regenerate on their own. I have so many of these, a real painful time sink to locate and manually regenerate each one. Thanks in advance. I suppose a kind of overkill method would be to just delete the shaders and scripts folder an re-import to force a regen. **Scratch that, deleteing the scripts and shader folder and re-importing doesn't force a regen. There should be an option the Alloy drop down for this, it isn't the first time we have updated Alloy and it broke all our materials and had to spend time fixing them.

 

Search for '_Alloy' in the project window select them all and reimport, then restart. That usually does the trick for me, I've had problems in the past when I've created a custom version of an alloy shader and forgot to update it on a version upgrade

 

Nvidia has a VRworks.cginc... will it work?

 

Ahh thanks man! I spent the time and fixed all 100+ of them yesterday manually after waiting about 10 minutes and not thinking of anything else. Originally I did a search for _AlloyPM and found them all, but when multi selecting them I noticed the regenerate button was missing - never thought to do re-import. DOH! This will save me a lot of time for now on, as my materials will probably break again with the next Alloy update.

 

Hey hey, I am trying to add a vertex movement for grass wind movement on custom mesh,

is there a way to modify the translucency+ so it could have that ?

 

Hey all. Sorry about the delayed responses. I'm currently trying to wrap up Alloy 4.1.1 to get it out the door this week.

@OP3NGL
Okay, I wasn't aware that that existed. I'll give it a look when I have some time.

@AruRen

1. You would need to copy these files into a separate folder.
   • "Alloy/Shaders/3.0/Specialist/Transmission *.shader"
   • "Alloy/Shaders/Definition/Transmission.cginc"
   • "Alloy/Shaders/Type/Standard.cginc"
2. Inside the "*.shader files, you'd need to patch the include paths in the passes to point to your custom definition header.
3. Then you need to modify that definition header to point to your custom shader type header.
4. Then you need to modify your custom shader type header to run your vertex animation code inside the "aVertexShader" callback.

I hope that helps.

 

Alloy 4.1.1 for Unity 2017.1 is live on the Asset Store

Try it out and give us feedback. Thanks.

Changelog:
Version 4.1.1
=====================
Shaders:
- Changed "Eye" shaders to add Roughness Source, Cornea Metallic, and Sclera Metallic properties.
* "Property" option which applies just the roughness sliders without the roughness map.
* You may need to manually disable the material map property in your materials.
- Changed "Car Paint" shaders to add a secondary color map mode.
- Changed "Car Paint" shaders to add a Roughness Source dropdown.
* "Property" option which applies just the roughness slider without the roughness map.
- Fixed visualize not applying parent texture transforms to children.
- Fixed "Directional Blend" shaders to stop popping issue between edit and play mode.
* World is now the default mapping mode.
* You must run the Material Migrator tool exactly once to fix existing materials.
- Fixed "TriPlanar" shaders to stop popping issue between edit and play mode.
* World is now the default mapping mode.
* You must run the Material Migrator tool exactly once to fix existing materials.
- Fixed "Vertex Blend" shaders to stop popping issue between edit and play mode.
* World is now the default mapping mode.
* You must run the Material Migrator tool exactly once to fix existing materials.

Mods:
- Fixed "Deferred Decal Advanced" shader so that:
* The shader actually compiles.
* Base Color and Normals blend sliders work now.
* Surface material type is no longer overwritten.
* Surface shadow masks are no longer overwritten.
* Decal specular occlusion now combines with the surface specular occlusion rather than replacing it.

 

This may well be a known and/or stupid issue but after I went through and installed Alloy the inspector UI elements seem broken. No borders and stuff anymore just the code to create them etc. Have a look. Would love some help with this. Even if I could just uninstall everything and try again

 

So, I think it's because my Unity pulled down Alloy 3.6.4 instead of 4.1

 

@thegreyman1
If you're running Unity 2017.1, then yes that would be a problem.

 

Another question- has the intensity gain disappeared for emissive properties? It's no longer underneat hthe weight slider

 

@thegreyman1
We deprecated and removed that property years ago in favor of using Unity's HDR color picker on the Tint property. The same is true for all our emissive effects.

 

@n00body hey bro

the phong strength slider on the skin tessellation shader (phong mode) seems to be broken
I've tried 4.1.1, wasn't working for me in 4.1 either, no error just doesn't do anything

Edit: I've figured this out my new characters were exported with a file size of 1:1 the old ones were 0.1:1 which was dropping the phong effect by a factor of 10

 

I need a double-sided Alloy shader. Any advice?
P.S. Sorry if it's a stupid question, I'm new to shaders

 

@punk
No problem. Glad it wasn't something wrong with the shaders.

@Hexer_
We have a TwoSided variants of our Transmission shaders. Does that help at all?

 

Shaders are all good

Third party support for Hair Designer would be awesome in a future update

 

I was running the migration tool after updating to the latest version of Alloy, but think I shut Unity down before it was finished, must have been behind the main interface. So, the issue (triplanar appears as World Mapping on object during Play) on the object still remains, can I run it again or no?

 

@punk
Link please?

@Don-Gray
If you have a small number of TriPlanar materials, you can manually toggle the setting back and forth once to fix them. The migration tool just does it on a large scale.

 

https://www.assetstore.unity3d.com/en/#!/content/71471

 

Too asking about the NVIDIA VRWorks, which provides huge improvements for VR project but currently Alloy isn't fully compatible with it, would be great if you could take a look and do something about it. Thanks.

 

Hi, do Alloy shaders support MaterialPropertyBlock when GPU instancing is enabled? When enabling instancing, identical meshes get batched, however, modifying any property like color or tiling using MaterialPropertyBlock breaks batching.

Looking into the shader code, it seems like none of the shader properties are set up to support this, is that right? Thanks.

 

I'm using "Alloy Deferred Skin" shader in graphics setting section. does this work with UBER too?

 

Hello, @n00body

First of all just wanted to say that Alloy is great, really pleased with it so far. Recently, however, I ran into one issue with Transmission shader. For some reason, meshes using 2-sided transmission shader appear darker than they should. It seems that back facing normals are darker than the front facing ones. I've made a comparison image between SpeedTree 2-sided shader and Alloy's 2-sided transmission shader:

Alloy 2-sided transmission shader


SpeedTree shader

Any idea how this issue could be solved? I am currently running Alloy version 3.6.1

Thank you in advance!

P.S. Invert Back Normals toggle doesn't seem to do anything, and mysteriously disappears after pressing Play... weird stuff.

 

Kia ora

Jus been put onto this as being a life saver for Unity, Tho for me as a hobbyist it's a lot of money and before anybody start jumping up and down it no dout worth every penny. It still a lot for me on a pension not making money from what I do so I ask a lot first I brought this some time ago for doing skin and it's will be great when I get my head round it but I need to know if I'm gonna break stuff mixing these two https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/vfx/shaders/pre-integrated-skin-shader-7238 Also I have World Creator 2 for making terrains that has both splat-maps and heat-maps I can export to make terrain materials https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/tools/terrain/world-creator-professional-55073 that I would like to be able to enhance the use of

 

Sorry to everyone about the late replies. The forums didn't send me emails AGAIN!

@Korindian
Correct.

@ksam2
It will "work with UBER" if you don't use their translucency shaders. This is because we both use the same trick to pass translucency data to the deferred shaders, but then use the data differently in our shaders.

@Radishface
Please tell me your Unity version. Thanks.

@Kiwi-Hawk
If you have budget concerns, then you should probably go through some pre-planning and make absolutely sure that our product is the best way to get the look you want for your game. The Pre-Integrated Skin shader you linked won't receive our area lights in its shading effect, and I haven't tested integration with World Creator.

 

Thanks for the replay

 

@n00body Hey! My Unity version is 5.6.1p1, and we are using Alloy 3.6.4 (upgraded from 3.6.1), yet still the same issue exists.

 

@n00body

Quick question, will Alloy work when we port to PS4?

 

Do alloy souport SetPropertyBlock ? https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/Renderer.SetPropertyBlock.html

 

Ok I should maybe have asked if I can get that look or realism with Alloy's skin shader, that char your displaying does not do much to install confidence tho the two male heads (If I remember rightly) are from threads dealing with that same or similar skin tech dev lines, trying to achieve as much realism as possible. What I'm after is along the lines of Witcher 3, modded Skyrim or close just as examples, Sparrow and twin Blaster from paragon would work to as examples. I think you can get a general idea what I aiming at. The images post above by RenOli are looking pretty good if he's using Alloy for skin that is

 

@n00body I thought I'd post you a couple of recent images from Brides Of Vampira, in the top one I'm using Micro Splat for the terrain, but everything else is Alloy. I've been using it recently to create water effects and I even managed to create a realistic ocean with foam and waves etc, amazing what you can do with the effects channels and some scrolling etc, one day I might be able to thank you all in person at some event, but until then thanks again!

 

@n00body I read earlier on in the thread that mobile (android/ios) may be supported after 5.6 dropped, since it's been a while I was wondering if there is an update on that. I want to use the car paint shader on an android game, please let me know

 

Sorry for the late replies. The day job has been demanding a huge amount of my time and effort lately.

@Radishface

1. Are you in forward or deferred mode?
2. Are you using the forward-specific variants of the shaders?

@OP3NGL
Yes, our customers with devkits have confirmed that it works on the PS4, Xbox One, and even the Switch (albeit only with heavy optimization).

@exltus
I believe so.

@Kiwi-Hawk
It's possible to get good results with Alloy, but our shaders are primarily focused on being deferred-compatible. As such, they won't have the degree of flexibility that you might need for your project.

@dizzymediainc
It compiles and runs, but some of our users have encountered weird NaN artifacts and I haven't hide time to set up a mobile test in which to track them down.

 

@n00body We are currently using deferred rendering path, in linear color space with HDR. And yes, we are using correct shader variants. Also, we've recently noticed that a similar issue occurs with SpeedTree trees while using Alloy SpeedTree shaders. I've linked a screenshot below.

 

@n00body
thanks, pls kindly explain what kind of "albeit only with heavy optimization"?

Approx when can you implement Nvidia VR works?

 

wow
open source now

 

Greetings Folks!

We have a pretty big announcement today, namely that Alloy is going Free and Open Source!

Repo Link: https://github.com/Josh015/Alloy

Josh and I (mostly Josh) have worked on Alloy now for just over 4 years now. It's been a delightful endeavor, and has always been driven by the hybridization of design and functionality needs of internal RUST projects, and the things we found to be of most general utility to the community. It's been a productive process, and an amazing learning process, both in terms of balancing the needs of many systems and approaches, and in just learning more and more about how folks actually use Unity.

But the time has come for both us where our focus, and the pressures on our time have shifted. Our internal projects are now much much more specialized (room-scale VR using forward mode, focused almost entirely on optimization over fancy visual features), and the number of asset-store systems often requiring some sort of bespoke compatibility shim to be created continues to increase, often necessitating a large outlay of time and effort to support the needs of only a few users. It's simply become untenable for us to keep Alloy being both what the community needs, and what we need, in terms of time and focus.

Further, with the future of rendering/shader configuration in Unity in a nebulous grey area, due to the announced Scriptable Rendering Loop system, and the way in which that will radically change how all shaders in Unity work, it does not, from our perspective, make sense to put significant further API work into a shader-based system that will have to be whole-sale replaced with a new paradigm in the foreseeable future.

So with that, as a courtesy to the gfx community whose work we all rely upon when making systems like this, and so that you folks who have found Alloy useful can tear it apart, merge it into whatever suits you, we are Open Sourcing it, and setting the package on the UAS to free. All of the fancy shmancy Alloy Editor code is also there, so if you want to fancy-up your own systems (and want to deal with the added complexity of such editors 0_0) you are welcome to it. Everything is covered by the standard MIT license.

Future Updates:

We will likely be continuing to update the git repo for Alloy for our own purposes for a period of time. This should not be taken as any implicit promise to do so on a timely basis, or prior to betas, or for a given version at all. The upgrade/update process for the main fork will be driven by our studio's internal needs. You are of course free to fork it and do what you may.

Refunds For Recent Purchases:

If you've purchased Alloy in the past 60 days, and would like a refund, please email alloy@rustltd.com and include your Asset Store purchase receipt, and we will forward our approval for the refund to the Unity asset store team.

Support:

As we are a contracting studio as well, paid support/modification for Alloy will still be available on a case by case basis at our studio's hourly rate. If you have needs of this sort that you cannot fulfill internally, please use our contact form found at www.rustltd.com and we'd be happy to return a quote/ask for further information.

Fin:

Thanks again for all of your interest and support over the years. Alloy has grown with us as we've grown as Unity users and game makers. We are now off to the next big challenge. Peace!

- Anton & Josh

 

Thanks for a great tool for the years you been here, and glad to see it up on GIT.... and not shut down .. So we can still use it.. best of luck with your next project.

 

Big thanks for all the hard work you guys put in over the years, legends!