Search Unity

  1. Unity Asset Manager is now available in public beta. Try it out now and join the conversation here in the forums.
    Dismiss Notice

2017.3.0 Beta 3 problems

Discussion in '2017.3 Beta' started by petersx, Oct 6, 2017.

  1. petersx

    petersx

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2015
    Posts:
    239
    Hi,

    1. TAB is still not working (see post huston we have problem)
    2. Cloth - is unusable for meshes greater than simply plane - after aplly cloth to skined mesh Unity calculating, calculating ... about 2 minutes. Without any editon of cloth, after press play, Unity calculating, calculating ... and show play window after 10 second . ... oh no .. after 10 minutes :). An this play windows with about 1-2 fps is unstopable. Of course the same skin mesh with cloth running very well in Unity 5.5/5.6
     
  2. Peter77

    Peter77

    QA Jesus

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Posts:
    6,609
    Seems like you found a regression in Unity. I guess Unity Technologies would be thankful if you submit a bug-report following the advice in this document.

    Using the bug-reporter seems to be an important step, because it makes sure the report is in Unity Technologies bug-tracking pipeline and has to be processed at some point. Using the forum is often used to add to a little more attention to a bug-report, but does not replace submitting the bug-report.

    It's from advantage to attach a project to the bug-report that UT can use to reproduce the issue and test their fix against. The easier an issue can be reproduced by QA, the more likely it is to get forwarded to a developer, who might or might not work on a bug-fix for that at some point.

    After you submitted the bug-report, you receive a confirmation email with a Case number. UT often asks us to post the Case number in the forum thread, which allows them to find that bug-report if they look at your post.

    Following these steps will increase the chance that UT is looking at your issue tremendously.
     
  3. petersx

    petersx

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2015
    Posts:
    239
    Hi Peter77,

    You have absolute right. I do as you write.
    1. Case 956849
    2. Case 956856

    best regards
     
    Peter77 and LeonhardP like this.